🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a ban on deploying state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a latest court ruling.

Appeals Court Agrees to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an larger group of eleven justices. The court also overturned a previous ruling from a three-judge panel that had supported the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest turn in a long-running court case over whether the administration has the authority and valid reason to send national guard forces in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was started in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has claimed that government employees at the immigration center in the southern part of the city were under attack, while city and state officials assert that local officers have control of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of the city as “war ravaged”, locals have been posting videos of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in Portland issued two legal injunctions this period – one preventing the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the deployment of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to evade the first order by calling up out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of state troops – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard by the full court – with all decisions under review together – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This ruling demonstrates that facts are important and that the courts are striving to ensure government responsibility. The constitution limits the executive authority, and local populations cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The court is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot dispatch the military into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, values, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding progresses and our legal battle continues in the courts.”